-
The Lawfare Podcast: The Big Internet Case That Wasn't
The Supreme Court last week issued the biggest opinion in the history of the internet—except that it didn’t. -
For Better or Worse, the Supreme Court Rewrote JASTA
Twitter v. Taamneh alters the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act’s vague aiding and abetting standard but provides limited clarity. -
Supreme Court Grants Cert in Lindke and O’Connor-Ratcliff
The two cases involve the First Amendment implications of public officials blocking others on social media. -
The Lawfare Podcast: The Dark History of the Information Age
Scott Shapiro has a new book on how and why hacking works and what to do about it, called “Fancy Bear Goes Phishing: The Dark History of the Information Age, in Five Extraordinary Hacks.” -
Hacking and Cybersecurity: Class 1, Practical Cybersecurity
The first class of Lawfare's cybersecurity and hacking course is now available to the public. -
The Nuts and Bolts of the Revised Justice Dept. News Media Guidelines
The 2022 guidelines establish express protections for receiving and publishing government secrets. -
In Hong Kong, Another Blow to the Rule of Law
Recent revisions barring foreign lawyers in national security cases call into question Hong Kong’s commitment to its obligations under international human rights law. -
The Week That Will Be
Lawfare’s weekly roundup of event announcements and employment opportunities. -
The Lawfare Podcast: Patrick Weil on ‘The Madman in the White House’
In November 1919, President Woodrow Wilson made a self-defeating decision. -
Unsealed Surveillance Court Document Reveals 702 Misuse
A Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court opinion documents improper use of the FBI’s 702 database. -
Should Nine Oath Keepers Receive Terror-Enhanced Sentences?
The government’s requests are aggressive and, extrapolating from judges’ previous sentencing practices, unlikely to be accepted in full. -
The Biden Administration’s Dangerous Grand Strategy
Can the liberal international order survive the strategy to save it? -
The Lawfare Podcast: Alex Iftimie on DOJ’s Recent Cyber Disruption Efforts
-
The Supreme Court Punts on Section 230
Thoughts on Gonzalez, Taamneh, and the future of Section 230. -
The Taamneh and Gonzalez Rulings, Explained
The Supreme Court ruled that the social media companies are not liable for ISIS attacks that victims’ families claimed resulted from algorithms promoting terrorist content on their platforms. -
Chatter: ‘Special Military Operations’ Against the Russians with Benjamin Wittes
-
The Lawfare Podcast: Crack-Up Capitalism with Quinn Slobodian
Think about the world. You might be picturing a globe in a classroom, with its patchwork of multi-colored nations. But what if that’s only part of the story? -
Chatter: ‘Special Military Operations’ Against the Russians with Benjamin Wittes
-
Rational Security: The 'Low Down Dirty Shane' Edition
This week, Alan and Scott were joined by co-host emeritus (and Washington Post star reporter) Shane Harris to talk over the week's news. -
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Twitter in Taamneh, Remands Gonzalez
The companion cases mark a major decision in platform liability for terrorist material hosted on their services.
More Articles
-
Lawfare Daily: Adam Chan on the FCC’s Growing Role in National Security
Why has the FCC's role in national security role grown? -
The Judicial Learning Curve
District court judges watch each other struggle with the Trump administration—and adapt. -
Why Liability and Insurance Won’t Save AI: Lessons From Cyber Insurance
Holding AI developers responsible for any harm their systems cause may not be the most effective path to promoting AI safety.