Courts & Litigation

Part III concludes this series, detailing how India’s judiciary has been complicit in the Modi government’s prosecution of political opponents.

Part II delves into the strategies employed by the Modi government to undermine the autonomy of the judicial branch.

Another day, another hearing on whether Trump’s co-defendants can remove their cases to federal court.

Part I outlines the constitutional framework of India’s justice system and how the Modi government has sought to exploit the system’s weaknesses.

The circuit courts’ split grows more pressing after a district court decision requires warrants for cell phone searches at the border.

Is a growing reliance on special counsels prudent?

Just like Mark Meadows, Clark needs to establish three things to get his case into federal court.

Both Supreme Court and D.C. Circuit precedents hold that a judge’s in-court statements about cases before them almost never warrant recusal.