Latest in Courts & Litigation
-
A New Low? Presidential Records and the Role of OLC
An extraordinary constitutional claim from OLC threatens decades of practice—and now faces the courts. -
DHS’s Misleading Press Release Smears a U.S. Judge in Rhode Island
The judge has referred an assistant U.S. attorney for an ethics inquiry, but she has said that DHS was the truly bad actor. -
New Trove of Fulton County Case Materials Published
Lawfare expects to publish more materials obtained from the case file, as well as additional reporting and analysis drawn from these materials. -
The Politically Motivated Indictment of Southern Poverty Law Center
The political motivations, allegations, and gaping legal holes in the Justice Department’s cynical indictment of the Southern Poverty Law Center. -
Lawfare Daily: The Supreme Court’s Long Shadow with Steve Vladeck and Kate Klonick
Listen to a podcast version of the May 7 Substack Live. -
Rational Security: The “I’ve Never Done THAT Before!” Edition
Scott Anderson, Molly Roberts, Roger Parloff, and Tyler McBrien talked through the week’s big national security news stories. -
What the Murthy v. Missouri and Daily Wire Consent Decrees Do—and Don’t—Establish
Despite the spin, these consent decrees are negotiated settlements—not court verdicts. They contain no judicial finding or admission that a Biden-era “censorship regime” existed. -
Lawfare Daily: Chatting on Chatrie with Adam Unikowsky, Michael Dreeben, and Richard Salgado
A panel of experts break down Supreme Court oral argument in Chatrie v. United States. -
Lawfare Daily: The Trials of the Trump Administration, May 1
Listen to the May 1 podcast as a livestream. -
Maurene Comey’s Firing Exposes the Limits of Thunder Basin
Judge Furman rules that Article II removals fall outside of the MSPB’s jurisdiction. -
Lawfare Live: The Trials of the Trump Administration, May 1
Join the Lawfare team at 4 pm ET for a discussion of the litigation surrounding the Trump administration. -
What Does the Correspondents Dinner Have to Do With Trump’s Ballroom Project?
The case may test just how far national security deference by the courts to the executive can stretch.


