Trump’s spree of firings exposes a dilemma for Congress: a reliance on presidents to respect the independence of executive branch officials.

The Supreme Court’s procedural ruling in Trump v. J.G.G. could have real costs for those swept up by the AEA and for the separation of powers.

The allegation seems to stem from double hearsay in a document authored by a later suspended police detective.

Trump and Bukele play three-card monte with a detainee.

Trump claims he can fire officers not picked by the president and hire acting leaders for Senate-confirmed roles outside the Vacancies Act.

Why would anyone grant these people a presumption of regularity?

President Trump’s restructuring of the administrative state is unprecedented—what does Supreme Court precedent say about its legitimacy?

In the lower courts, the presumption of regularity is in free fall—if it hasn’t crashed already.