The Dark Side of International Cybersecurity Information Sharing
Earlier this week, I wrote a short blog suggesting the need for an international component to the cybersecurity information sharing proposals pending in the Senate. In the interests of doing the idea fair justice, today's post is a short reference to the "dark side" of the problem -- namely that not all international actors are good partners for cyber threat and vulnerability information sharing. As the New York Times
}
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Earlier this week, I wrote a short blog suggesting the need for an international component to the cybersecurity information sharing proposals pending in the Senate. In the interests of doing the idea fair justice, today's post is a short reference to the "dark side" of the problem -- namely that not all international actors are good partners for cyber threat and vulnerability information sharing. As the New York Times reports today, the computer security firm, Symantec, is dissolving its alliance with the Chinese firm Huawei. The reason, unsurprisingly, is that the connection between the two companies was seen by Symantec as a barrier to its own ambitions domestically. Even in the absence of legislation, the Executive Branch is moving forward to expand the sharing of classified cyber threat information with domestic companies. As the Times reports, "Symantec feared the alliance with the Chinese company would prevent it from obtaining United States government classified information about cyberthreats." Huawei denies that it has an affiliation with the Chinese government, but it seems that China's widely-perceived espionage activity is starting to have practical effects.
In any event, the episode does illuminate part of the problem of sharing classified threat information -- who do you trust? That's a problem on the domestic side and will be an even greater challenge if the international aspects of cyber threat information sharing are considered.
Paul Rosenzweig is the founder of Red Branch Consulting PLLC, a homeland security consulting company. He formerly served as deputy assistant secretary for policy in the Department of Homeland Security. He is a professorial lecturer in law at George Washington University, a senior fellow in the Tech, Law & Security program at American University, and a board member of the Journal of National Security Law and Policy.
More Articles
-
Israel, Qatar, and the Limits of Self-Defense
Israel’s airstrike in Doha, which was a serious violation of international law, risks normalizing preventive war under Article 51. -
Scaling Laws: AI and Energy: What do we know? What are we learning?
Discussing the energy costs of artificial intelligence. -
Keep the National Counterterrorism Center’s Focus Off of Americans
NCTC should not compile and disseminate Americans’ information in the name of fighting domestic terrorism.