Today's Headlines and Commentary
First off, a bit of administrative business concerning the news and commentary feature going forward. While I was camped out in my undisclosed location, Ritika handled the news. Now that I am back, she and I will be sharing the feature, so expect to see it change hands regularly from now on and expect as well that our styles may differ a bit.
Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
First off, a bit of administrative business concerning the news and commentary feature going forward. While I was camped out in my undisclosed location, Ritika handled the news. Now that I am back, she and I will be sharing the feature, so expect to see it change hands regularly from now on and expect as well that our styles may differ a bit. I am afraid that I cannot do proper justice to Ritika's moments of Zen, for example, so she will continue to be your sole source for that. Readers should continue sending interesting articles we may have missed--or that readers think we should include--to either of us at singh.lawfare@gmail.com or wakeman.lawfare@gmail.com.
Roger Cohen of the New York Times examines the shift from President Bush's approach to the war on terror to the Obama administration's angle, which he defines as the "doctrine of silence."
Conor Friedersdorf over at The Atlantic picks up on Kevin Drum's Mother Jones post about the end of Al Qaeda, and (arguably) the need for a new congressional authorization to continue the war on terror. Bobby wrote about the implications here, which Drum quoted in his post.
Reports from London indicate that News International may have hacked into the computer of a cabinet minister who was responsible for Northern Ireland and may have potentially taken classified material. Alan Cowell at the Times reports.
Despite President Obama's veto threat and a slew of complaints, the NDAA continues to advance with the detention provisions, reports Jeremy Herb of The Hill. Here is a partial list of complaints:
- FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III's letter, which I posted earlier. The AP's Donna Cassetta reports on the letter here;
- Senator Mark Udall, who is pushing to remove the detention provisions, writes this Washington Post op-ed arguing that the Senate version of the NDAA expands the military's responsibility for detention;
- Human Rights First has this press release regarding two letters signed by retired military leaders in support of Senator Udall's amendment, which Ben's reluctantly endorsed here, and in opposition Senator Ayotte's amendment which would authorize the creation of a new classified annex to the Army Field Manual on interrogation for high-value detainees.
Raffaela Wakeman is a Senior Director at In-Q-Tel. She started her career at the Brookings Institution, where she spent five years conducting research on national security, election reform, and Congress. During this time she was also the Associate Editor of Lawfare. From there, Raffaela practiced law at the U.S. Department of Defense for four years, advising her clients on privacy and surveillance law, cybersecurity, and foreign liaison relationships. She departed DoD in 2019 to join the Majority Staff of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where she oversaw the Intelligence Community’s science and technology portfolios, cybersecurity, and surveillance activities. She left HPSCI in May 2021 to join IQT.
Raffaela received her BS and MS in Political Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2009 and her law degree from Georgetown University Law Center in 2015, where she was recognized for her commitment to public service with the Joyce Chiang Memorial Award. While at the Department of Defense, she was the inaugural recipient of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence’s General Counsel Award for exhibiting the highest standards of leadership, professional conduct, and integrity.