Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
After reading this chapter, I wondered how a meeting involving classified information so sensitive that a close Obama aide and former top national security official could not attend could the following year be recounted in such loving detail in the first chapter of a best-selling book. Woodward clearly got his information from participants in the meeting or their close aides. Was it right for these people to speak to Woodward about these matters? Was it legal? I sent these questions to John Rizzo, the just-retired thirty-four year veteran CIA lawyer who has seen his share of leaked classified information over the years.
Simple. When a President himself is a key source and directs or at least signals to his Administration to cooperate with the author, that for all intents and purposes means the book becomes one big authorized disclosure. That's what Obama did for Woodward, and that’s what Bush did for Woodward in his three books during that Administration, which also were packed with hitherto sensitive information. That’s what is remarkable and unique about Woodward's standing.That addresses the legal issue, but it raises the question why President Obama (and President Bush before him) thought it a good idea to disclose so much highly classified information. At a time when the Obama administration is aggressively asserting the state secrets privilege in court and prosecuting like never before government leakers of classified information, the Woodward book puts in a bad light the secrecy system that presidents can turn on or off at will, not always obviously in the national interest.