Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
"the nature, scope, and degree of risk, including risk of harm to national security, law enforcement, or other Federal missions and risk of endangerment, including to personal safety and security, financial security (such as through identity theft), and privacy, of officers and employees and their family members, that may be posed by website and other publication of financial disclosure forms and associated personal information."The Senate had passed the bill last Saturday before leaving town. After initially balking, the House passed the bill in pro forma session earlier today, and President Obama signed it immediately. Although congressional staff of most committees fully understood the danger of posting detailed financial information about senior exceutive branch officials on the Internet, apparently Members of Congress were fearful of delaying implementation beyond December, or simply eliminating the requirement (which would have been the wise thing to do), lest they be criticized prior to the elections. Kudos in particular to the staffs of Senators Lieberman and Collins of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee for shepherding the bill through the Senate, and to Congressman Chris Van Hollen for bird-dogging this in the House. When Congress reconvenes during the lame duck session, one hopes that they will delay implementation further until they receive the results of the NAPA study, and ultimately eliminate this misguided provision altogether. Unlike many other issues debated on this blog, eliminating Section 11 should NOT be a hard national security choice.