Criminal Justice & the Rule of Law

D.C. Circuit Keeps Parts of Trump Gag Order in Federal Election Interference Case

Hyemin Han
Friday, December 8, 2023, 3:27 PM
The appeals court kept the parts of the order regarding protection of witnesses and court personnel, but vacated the rest. 

Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
Brookings

On Dec. 8, Judges Cornelia Pillard, Patricia Millett, and Bradley Garcia of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed in part and vacated in part U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan's limited gag order on former President Donald Trump.

The court affirmed Chutkan's order to the extent that it prohibits parties and counsel from making public statements, or directing others to make public statements, about known witnesses—as well as those who may be reasonably foreseeable witnesses—regarding their participation in the criminal proceedings or the ongoing investigation.

The court also affirmed Chutkan's order to the extent that it prohibits parties and counsel from making public statements, or directing others to make public statements, regarding three categories of speech, to the extent that those statements "are made with the intent to materially interfere with, or to cause others to materially interfere with, counsel’s or staff’s work in this criminal case, or with the knowledge that such interference is highly likely to result." Those three categories are statements about: 1) counsel in the case besides Special Counsel Jack Smith; 2) court staff and personnel; or 3) family of counsel and court staff or personnel. 

But other than these specified categories, the court vacated the rest of the district court's order. The court also specifically noted what it finds Trump is allowed to comment on: 

As should be clear, but to avoid any potential doubt, as affirmed in part and vacated in part, the Order also leaves open the categories of speech the district court explicitly stated were permissible under its initial ruling. See Order at 3. Mr. Trump is free to make statements criticizing the current administration, the Department of Justice, and the Special Counsel, as well as statements that this prosecution is politically motivated or that he is innocent of the charges against him. 

You can read the order here or below. You can read dispatches from the gag order hearings at the D.C. Circuit here and at the district court here.

 


Hyemin Han is an associate editor of Lawfare and is based in Washington, D.C. Previously, she worked in eviction defense and has interned on Capitol Hill and with the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. She holds a BA in government from Dartmouth College, where she was editor-in-chief of The Dartmouth independent daily.

Subscribe to Lawfare