Congress Cybersecurity & Tech Surveillance & Privacy

Harmonizing ECPA to Close Gaps and Increase Statutory Coherence

Aaron R. Cooper
Friday, March 6, 2026, 6:00 AM
Modern communications and privacy law needs technology-neutral rules.
Digital surveillance. (https://www.accelaz.com/using-high-performance-computing-to-reduce-the-costs-of-deploying-video-surveillance/; CC BY-NC 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA) was designed to protect the privacy of electronic communications while providing a clear framework for law enforcement access to user data. But forty years of technological change have exposed statutory gaps and inconsistencies that undermine both goals. Rather than proposing a wholesale rewrite, this report identifies four targeted reforms to harmonize ECPA’s provisions and improve statutory coherence.

First, it proposes aligning the legal standard for pen register and trap-and-trace devices with the higher standard already required for comparable stored data under Section 2703(d) of the Stored Communications Act (SCA). Second, it proposes extending the Wiretap Act’s procedural protections—including predicate-crime limitations and suppression remedies—to electronic communications, which currently lack parity with oral and wire communications. Third, it proposes adding a suppression remedy for content obtained in violation of the SCA’s requirements. And fourth, it proposes establishing an explicit statutory right for communications service providers to challenge surveillance orders issued under the SCA.

Taken together, these reforms would create a more coherent and technology-neutral framework, furthering important rule-of-law principles without undermining law enforcement’s legitimate investigative capabilities.

This paper was published as part of a series marking the 40th anniversary of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. View the paper series here.

You can read this paper here or below:

 


Aaron R. Cooper is a Partner at Jenner & Block LLP. Mr. Cooper also served as the lead investigative counsel for the Minority in the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence’s bipartisan investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 US elections. Before that, he was a prosecutor in the Department of Justice’s Computer Crimes and Intellectual Property Section, where he investigated and prosecuted high-tech and intellectual property crimes.
}

Subscribe to Lawfare