-
It is now clear that any deal with Iran will by its terms be a non-binding agreement. That means the United States will have no international law obligation to comply with the agreement.
-
We talk about the David Petraeus plea, ISIS propaganda, and John Brennan's plans to reorganize the CIA. If you haven't yet checked out Rational Security, please do.
-
This episode of the podcast features Rep.
-
Earlier this morning, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee heard testimony from Secretary of State John Kerry, Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mart...
-
ISIS has released a video appearing to show the execution of an Israeli Arab by a child soldier. The Wall Street Journal reports that, if confirmed, the execution of Mohammed Said Ismail Musallam would m...
-
C-SPAN's Washington Journal had two lengthy segments on the AUMF controversy this morning.
-
Editor's note: The following is adapted from a post on Markaz, the blog of the Brookings Center for Middle East Policy.
Lawfare has already seen a lot of coverage about the letter 47 Republican senators...
-
This is an excellent bit of radio about one of the weirder forms of attack during World War II---the only one I know of that produced casualties in the continental United States: balloon bombing.
-
If, as Marty and I just argued, the deal with Iran is a non-binding agreement under international law, then, as we stated, “there is little doubt about the President’s constitutional authority to make th...
-
[Cross-posted at Just Security.]
In Marty’s post yesterday about the letter that 47 Senators sent to “the Leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he briefly addressed the quest
-
The New York Times today has an op-ed by the founder of Wikipedia called Stop Spying on Wikipedia Users.
-
Yesterday, in what many have termed an unprecedented move, 47 Republican senators released an open letter to the “leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” making note that any deal without the expressed...