-
We pick up with a quick clarifying point about vicarious liability: the idea, the military judge confirms with the Chief Prosecutor, is that the jury must find that a substantive offenses was committed, ...
-
It’s 1:32 when the commission is once more called to order, and AE120 is teed up in earnest. That’s the government’s motion to make so-called “minor conforming changes” to the charge sheet, so as to mak...
-
Human rights advocates often express disappointment (if not anger) that the U.S. Government (and the Obama Administration in particular) is not more supportive of lawsuits in U.S.
-
Another day, another major outage caused by our soon-to-be-former hosting company, Bluehost. Our sincere apologies. Ritika and I just got off the phone with Bluehost, which acknowledges that for the seco...
-
Let us now discuss, for but a fleeting moment, the ongoing representation status of CDR Walter Ruiz.
-
We return to our regularly-scheduled programming at the Expeditionary Legal Complex’s Courtroom #2. Presenting rebuttal argument on AE107 is CDR Walter Ruiz, lawyer for 9/11 accused Mustafa al-Hawsawi. ...
-
Bloodless deaths continue to toll in Ghouta, near Damascus, where the Bashar al-Assad regime allegedly launched nerve gas attacks on Wednesday. The U.S.
-
Mustafa al-Hawsawi’s lawyer, CDR Walter Ruiz, stands to argue AE107---a motion to dismiss certain offenses as beyond military commission jurisdiction.
-
Two months ago, we ran a post explaining the NSA's minimization procedures based on a copy of the procedures (dating from June 2009) that had been leaked to the Guardian.
-
LCDR Kevin Bogucki argues AE105---or would, if the time were right. But it isn’t, in his opinion. Ramzi Binal Shibh’s attorney thinks AE031, a motion to dismiss for unlawful influence, jibes with AE105,...
-
Last day of the five-day session, y’all. Resplendent-in-robes time arrives, and the military judge notes that all five accused are absent.
-
TGIF, loyal readers. The crowd at Fort Meade's Burba cottage has thinned, but your Lawfare correspondents have front row seats in the last August session in United States v.