The court returns, apparently having familiarized itself with the motion to which Ruiz had referred earlier—AE64. (In the meantime, James Connell III, Learned Counsel for Ammar al-Baluchi, has left the ...

In AE71, CDR Walter Ruiz seeks additional information about two FBI agents who interrogated his client, Mustafa al-Hawsawi.  This apparently bears on the defense’s motion for a defective referral.

Movin’ right along to AE60.  CDR Walter Ruiz sets forth his request for various information about the military judge’s appointment.

I have now read through Al Maqaleh v. Gates and Hamidullah v. Obama, which are both brief reads. I don't have a great deal to say about them, except that they well represent the end of the line for the p...

On we march to AE22, the defense’s motion to grant public access to commission-designated broadcast sites.  That topic belongs to James Harrington, a member of Ramzi Binalshibh’s team.  Most people canno...

In AE10, the defense has asked for verbatim transcriptions of the Rule 802 conferences---which, as things stand now, are not recorded in that fashion.  On behalf of Walid Bin Attash, Cheryl Bormann comes...

Wells already posted U.S. District Judge John D. Bates's opinion dismissing Maqaeleh. Judge Bates also dismissed the related case of Hamidullah. I'm reading them both now and will have thoughts later tod...

Judge John Bates has granted the government's motion to dismiss in Al-Maqaleh et al v. Gates---in which detainees at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan had petitioned for writs of habeas corpus.

Jonathan Witmer-Rich of the Cleveland-Marshall College of Law writes in with these comments on Hamdan II: Reflecting on Hamdan II, I wonder if the court really responded to the government’s opening argum...

Prosecutor Clay Trivett opens his argument regarding AE36 with a list.  On it are Presidents Obama and Bush, Joe Biden and Senator Graham.  If the defense got what they wanted, Trivett says, all of these...

Steve, Ben, Jack, and Bobby have already posted some excellent thoughts on the DC Circuit's decision in Hamdan II.  I agree with many of them.