Published by The Lawfare Institute
in Cooperation With
You mentioned there was a tough decision. I don't think it was a tough decision. We've seen a lot of instances where presidents over the years have -- have had to make decisions like that. I think after spending that amount of time, that number of years and that much money -- we increased the special operations forces by about 50 percent. We increased their budget. We increased their equipment. And they develop these skill sets and improve the intelligence capability of our country. And finally, when all that comes together, to not make that decision, it seemed to me, would just be dumbfounding. I can't imagine any president not making that decision. That's not to say it wasn't a huge accomplishment. It was.And Greg Miller at the Washington Post tells us what's in those recently-released documents from Osama bin Laden's compound, documents which he says demonstrate the divisions in the Al Qaeda leadership over how to oversee the sprawling and directionless organization.
In normal practice, cases are developed to conform to the court. Here, because of how we mistreated some of the detainees, we are trying to develop a court to conform to the cases. We are setting an example for the world, but not a good one.The Army is restructuring its training and deployment procedures to emulate Special Operations forces. Read Thom Shanker's piece at the Times on General Ray Odierno's plan. NPR reviews Peter Bergen's new book, Manhunt: The Ten-Year Search for Bin Laden--from 9/11 to Abbottabad. For more interesting law and security-related articles, follow us on Twitter, visit the Georgetown Center on National Security and the Law’s Security Law Brief, Fordham Law’s Center on National Security’s Morning Brief, and Fordham Law’s Cyber Brief. Email us noteworthy articles we may have missed at [email protected] and [email protected].