-
On February 19, 2013, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court granted an order for the production of certain tangible things, applied for by the FBI pursuant to 50 U.S.C.
-
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has released a heavily redacted opinion issued on February 19, 2013. The opinion applies Section 1861 of Title 50. We will have a summary.
-
There are two new NSA email metadata collection program documents on the DNI's Tumblr site, IContheRecord.
From the site:
Following a declassification review by the Executive Branch, the Department of ...
-
Here's a lengthy interview with Edward Snowden by James Bamford in Wired. There's very little new in it---though some new details are in there about programs and activities that shocked Snowden while he ...
-
Yesterday two amicus briefs were filed on behalf of the appellees in Klayman v. Obama, the bulk metadata case up on appeal in the D.C. Circuit.
-
There is much to pore over in last week’s release by the Director National Intelligence. Responding to FOIA litigation, the DNI’s office posted more than thirty legal filings and related documents bearin...
-
Yesterday plaintiffs-appellees filed their response in Klayman v. Obama, the Section 215 metadata collection case up on appeal in the D.C. Circuit.
-
New on the DNI's Tumblr site, IC on the Record: on August 6, and in response to a FOIA request, the Department of Justice released a slew of newly declassified, redacted documents related to the National...
-
The thing kind of speaks for itself:
[View the story "My Twitter Exchange with Glenn Greenwald " on Storify]
-
So reports the New York Times:
MOSCOW — Edward J. Snowden, the American intelligence contractor who published a raft of secret documents and then fled to Russia, has been granted a three-year residence ...
-
Over at the Wall Street Journal, Siobhan Gorman is reporting on a new letter from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on Sen. Leahy's FISA reform legislation. Signed by U.S.
-
For the (two?) readers who are following the exchange between Steve and me on Article III and appellate review in the Leahy bill, I wanted to offer two responses to Steve's latest post. The first respons...