Latest in Terrorism & Extremism

Published by The Lawfare Institute in Cooperation With  Brookings
  • Almerfedi Oral Argument Preview

    Tomorrow morning, a panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear arguments in another Guantanamo habeas case, that of Hussain Salem Mohammad Almerfedi (Case No. 10-5291).
  • Thoughts on Judge Silberman's Opinion

    Judge Laurence Silberman's concurring opinion today in Esmail makes three points, each of them warranting comment. I have enormous regard for Judge Silberman, and I critique his opinion with caution. But...
  • Ouch!

    The D.C. Circuit's per curiam opinion today in Esmail is unremarkable--exactly what one would have suspected from the oral argument. Judge Laurence Silberman's concurrence, by contrast, is altogether rem...
  • D.C. Circuit Affirms Esmail

    Today the D.C. Circuit, in a per curiam decision accompanied by a concurrence from Judge Laurence Silberman, affirmed Judge Henry Kennedy's denial of habeas to petitioner Yasein Khasem Mohammad Esmail (C...
  • Books in the Mail

    My to-read shelf is getting unmanagebly stacked. Today's addition: Jonathan Hafetz's new book from NYU Press, Habeas Corpus After 9/11: Confronting America's New Global Detention System. According to Ama...
  • Two New Contest Entries

    Alejandro Manevich, a lawyer in Ontario and one of my oldest friends, writes in with the following: I have an idea for your Lawfare contest.  As a friendly amendment to Luis Dickson's proposal, might I s...
  • Or Maybe Not

    Luis M. Dickson's truly heroic effort to chart a path by which the Obama administration could conceivably live under the law as articulated by the New York Times editorial board seems, alas, to have hit ...
  • Do We Have a Winner?

    The first Lawfare contest--to come up "with a strategy for KSM that is both unambiguously lawful under [the law as stated in recent] New York Times editorials and politically conceivable on Planet Earth"...
  • And the Answer Is...

    Yesterday, I wondered how the New York Times would treat Attorney General Holder's announcement of a military commission trial for the September 11 conspirators: "Will the Times praise Holder for respect...
  • Thought #2 on the Holder Statement

    I am really--and I mean really--looking forward to the New York Times editorial on Holder's announcement.
  • Supreme Court Denies Cert. in Three More GTMO Cases

    The Supreme Court today denied three pending petitions for certiorari: Al Odah v. Obama (No. 10-439), Awad v. Obama (No. 10-736), and Al Bihani v. Obama (No. 10-7814).
  • Thought #1 on the Holder Statement

    I don't disagree with Eric Holder's complaint regarding the role Congress has played in tying the Executive Branch's hands with respect to bringing the 9/11 conspirators to trial. In fact, I strongly agr...
Support Lawfare
The Lawfare Store

Subscribe to Lawfare