-
Jack Goldsmith spoke to Jeffrey Toobin about his new book on the bombing and trial called, “Homegrown: Timothy McVeigh and the Rise of Right-Wing Extremism.”
-
This week, Alan, Quinta, and Scott were reunited to celebrate Alan's gradual physical and mental decline, and to talk over the week in national security news.
-
Policymakers can strengthen both the ASDA and ICADA within a national security context, using the CHIPS Act as a model for the drone sector.
-
The United States needs to create a government-wide process to carefully weigh if and when it would ever use deepfakes.
-
The Supreme Court last week issued the biggest opinion in the history of the internet—except that it didn’t.
-
Twitter v. Taamneh alters the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act’s vague aiding and abetting standard but provides limited clarity.
-
The two cases involve the First Amendment implications of public officials blocking others on social media.
-
Scott Shapiro has a new book on how and why hacking works and what to do about it, called “Fancy Bear Goes Phishing: The Dark History of the Information Age, in Five Extraordinary Hacks.”
-
The first class of Lawfare's cybersecurity and hacking course is now available to the public.
-
The 2022 guidelines establish express protections for receiving and publishing government secrets.
-
Recent revisions barring foreign lawyers in national security cases call into question Hong Kong’s commitment to its obligations under international human rights law.
-
Lawfare’s weekly roundup of event announcements and employment opportunities.
-
In November 1919, President Woodrow Wilson made a self-defeating decision.
-
A Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court opinion documents improper use of the FBI’s 702 database.
-
The government’s requests are aggressive and, extrapolating from judges’ previous sentencing practices, unlikely to be accepted in full.
-
Can the liberal international order survive the strategy to save it?
-
-
Thoughts on Gonzalez, Taamneh, and the future of Section 230.
-
The Supreme Court ruled that the social media companies are not liable for ISIS attacks that victims’ families claimed resulted from algorithms promoting terrorist content on their platforms.
-
Think about the world. You might be picturing a globe in a classroom, with its patchwork of multi-colored nations. But what if that’s only part of the story?
.jpg?sfvrsn=24f646ff_5)
5fb0df31-eed1-4934-9d24-afe6bce8a2c6.jpg?sfvrsn=9b4cc490_3)
.jpg?sfvrsn=c0407039_3)
-).jpg?sfvrsn=5f8fac12_3)
.jpg?sfvrsn=d7f3113b_3)
