-
The Week That Will Be
Lawfare's weekly round-up of event announcements and employment opportunities. -
The Exaggerated Threat of Oil Wars
Countries won’t fight for oil in the South China Sea—or anywhere else. -
The Week that Was: All of Lawfare in One Post
The Week that Was: All of Lawfare in One Post -
Attorney General William Barr Testifies Before House Judiciary Committee
-
The Week That Will Be
Lawfare's weekly round-up of event announcements and employment opportunities. -
Should Congress Play a Role in Arms Sales?
The Trump administration is considering ending one of the few congressional checks on arms sales to foreign countries. -
The Week that Was: All of Lawfare in One Post
Your weekly summary of everything on the site. -
Rational Security: The 'Not-So-Secret Police' Edition
-
The Week That Will Be
Lawfare's weekly round-up of event announcements and employment opportunities. -
What Does a "Terrorist" Designation Mean?
A label is different from enforcement—it's about sending a signal. -
The Week that Was: All of Lawfare in One Post
Your weekly summary of everything on the site. -
House Homeland Security Holds Hearing on Cyberspace Solarium Commission Recommendations
-
The Libertarian Case for Immigration (and Against Trump)
A Review of “Free to Move: Foot Voting, Migration, and Political Freedom” by Ilya Somin (Cato Institute Book, Oxford University Press, 2020) -
The Week That Will Be
Lawfare's weekly round-up of event announcements and employment opportunities. -
Wuhan, From the Cultural Revolution to COVID-19
Four lessons about what the history of the province where the coronavirus emerged tells us about the Chinese Communist Party. -
The Week that Was: All of Lawfare in One Post
Your weekly summary of everything on the site. -
Livestream: Panel Discussion of Trump Financial Documents Cases on 'In Lieu of Fun'
-
Supreme Court Rules in Trump Financial Records Cases
-
The Week That Will Be
Lawfare's weekly round-up of event announcements and employment opportunities. -
The Imaginary Unitary Executive
Contrary to the “Decision of 1789” myth, history shows that the first Congress rejected the exclusive unitary model of the presidency—and thus the presidential removal power should be subject to more con...
