-
U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest has issued this order clarifying the broad scope of the injunction in her earlier opinion striking down Section 1021 of the NDAA. The order does not rule on the gove...
-
You'll recall that the three-judge panel in Hamdan v.
-
This morning, National Public Radio ran this story, which Wells linked to earlier, noting that the concern that the United States was recreating Guantanamo at Bagram:
-
This morning's Supreme Court orders list makes no mention of the unresolved petitions in several Guantanamo-related cases. That means a re-listing for the justices' conference this Thursday.
Stay tun...
-
According to the Miami Herald's Carol Rosenberg, only three of the 9/11 defendants weighed in on the question, put to the prosecution by Judge James Pohl, of why the men should not be tried separately.
...
-
This morning, Paul flagged a Washington Post op-ed by Senators Coats, Rubio and Burr. The trio's piece concerns the improper revelation of national security secrets. As one example, the authors cite th...
-
The D.C. Circuit today handed down a decision in a civil case concerning Col.
-
Waaaay back in January, Ben noted that Ahmed Khalfan Ghailani had filed his opening brief in his appeal to the Second Circuit. Ghailani is appealing his conspiracy conviction and life sentence for his ro...
-
So reports Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald: Judge Pohl has set another hearing in United States v.
-
Over at SCOTUSblog, Lyle Deniston yesterday noted that, according to the Supreme Court's electronic docket, the Court's Thursday conference will address seven petitions for review in detainee-related cas...
-
That's the word from a member of the defense team, James Connell. His statement provides as follows:
This afternoon, the Guantanamo Bay military commission entered an order (AE035C) continuing the heari...
-
The Supreme Court issued orders this morning - but, as before, took no action on several Guantanamo-related petitions for certiorari.
