-
Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins last night released a statement regarding this week's hearing in United States v. Al-Nashiri. It begins as follows:
Tomorrow, the military commission convened to try the ch...
-
We begin the three-day hearing in United States v. Al-Nashiri with a modest venue change---not at Guantanamo, but at Fort Meade. The familiar Smallwood Hall will not be the site for our CCTV broadcast. ...
-
There were basically none. No discussion of Guantanamo, of habeas, of the NDAA, of interrogation, of military commissions, of targeted killing---and only the most cursory mention of drone strikes. This i...
-
It was on the tip of Schieffer's tongue, and yet nevertheless, the moderator refrained. But what if he had asked the candidates. . . about AE 104, perhaps the most important of the motions under conside...
-
Want a preview, if only a partial one, of what this week’s hearing in United States v. Al-Nashiri will look like? Then look no further than last week’s hearing, in United States v. Mohammed et al.
Have...
-
Last week I asked whether per se opposition to military commissions was in the GTMO detainees best interests, where their “interests” were defined as “(a) maximizing [the detainees’] procedural rights, a...
-
Jordan announced over the weekend that it has foiled an Al Qaeda plot targeted at a number of civilian and military targets in Amman, including the American Embassy there.
-
I've recently completed a short (10-page) draft meant to serve as a primer on key domestic law questions associated with computer network operations. The paper will be published as part of the proceedin...
-
Since the Lawfare Drone Smackdown convinced me that my martial arts life and my Lawfare life are less separate than I had thought, and since Jack has already posted this board-breaking picture---on the t...
-
I was out of the country last week and missed the opportunity to weigh in promptly on the Hamdan decision. In reading the reactions, I have noted that many human rights and civil liberties groups have i...
-
On Friday, Captain Jason Wright, an attorney for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, released the following statement about the most recent round of hearings in the 9/11 case:
PRESIDENT OBAMA RESTATES DESIRE TO CLOS...
-
Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins last night released this statement regarding the week-long hearing in United States v. Mohammed et al. It begins as follows:
Today was the last of five days of pre-trial se...
-
The court returns, apparently having familiarized itself with the motion to which Ruiz had referred earlier—AE64.
(In the meantime, James Connell III, Learned Counsel for Ammar al-Baluchi, has left the ...
-
In AE71, CDR Walter Ruiz seeks additional information about two FBI agents who interrogated his client, Mustafa al-Hawsawi. This apparently bears on the defense’s motion for a defective referral.
-
Movin’ right along to AE60. CDR Walter Ruiz sets forth his request for various information about the military judge’s appointment.
-
I have now read through Al Maqaleh v. Gates and Hamidullah v. Obama, which are both brief reads. I don't have a great deal to say about them, except that they well represent the end of the line for the p...
-
On we march to AE22, the defense’s motion to grant public access to commission-designated broadcast sites. That topic belongs to James Harrington, a member of Ramzi Binalshibh’s team. Most people canno...
-
Greg Miller at the Washington Post reports that the CIA is pushing for more drones.
Malala Yousufzai, the 14-year old girl shot by the Taliban on her school bus, is now able to stand with help, her doct...
-
In AE10, the defense has asked for verbatim transcriptions of the Rule 802 conferences---which, as things stand now, are not recorded in that fashion. On behalf of Walid Bin Attash, Cheryl Bormann comes...
-
Wells already posted U.S. District Judge John D. Bates's opinion dismissing Maqaeleh. Judge Bates also dismissed the related case of Hamidullah. I'm reading them both now and will have thoughts later tod...