-
For Better or Worse, the Supreme Court Rewrote JASTA
Twitter v. Taamneh alters the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act’s vague aiding and abetting standard but provides limited clarity. -
Supreme Court Grants Cert in Lindke and O’Connor-Ratcliff
The two cases involve the First Amendment implications of public officials blocking others on social media. -
The Lawfare Podcast: The Dark History of the Information Age
Scott Shapiro has a new book on how and why hacking works and what to do about it, called “Fancy Bear Goes Phishing: The Dark History of the Information Age, in Five Extraordinary Hacks.” -
Hacking and Cybersecurity: Class 1, Practical Cybersecurity
The first class of Lawfare's cybersecurity and hacking course is now available to the public. -
The Nuts and Bolts of the Revised Justice Dept. News Media Guidelines
The 2022 guidelines establish express protections for receiving and publishing government secrets. -
In Hong Kong, Another Blow to the Rule of Law
Recent revisions barring foreign lawyers in national security cases call into question Hong Kong’s commitment to its obligations under international human rights law. -
The Week That Will Be
Lawfare’s weekly roundup of event announcements and employment opportunities. -
The Lawfare Podcast: Patrick Weil on ‘The Madman in the White House’
In November 1919, President Woodrow Wilson made a self-defeating decision. -
Unsealed Surveillance Court Document Reveals 702 Misuse
A Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court opinion documents improper use of the FBI’s 702 database. -
Should Nine Oath Keepers Receive Terror-Enhanced Sentences?
The government’s requests are aggressive and, extrapolating from judges’ previous sentencing practices, unlikely to be accepted in full. -
The Biden Administration’s Dangerous Grand Strategy
Can the liberal international order survive the strategy to save it? -
The Lawfare Podcast: Alex Iftimie on DOJ’s Recent Cyber Disruption Efforts
-
The Supreme Court Punts on Section 230
Thoughts on Gonzalez, Taamneh, and the future of Section 230. -
The Taamneh and Gonzalez Rulings, Explained
The Supreme Court ruled that the social media companies are not liable for ISIS attacks that victims’ families claimed resulted from algorithms promoting terrorist content on their platforms. -
Rational Security: The 'Low Down Dirty Shane' Edition
This week, Alan and Scott were joined by co-host emeritus (and Washington Post star reporter) Shane Harris to talk over the week's news. -
The Lawfare Podcast: Crack-Up Capitalism with Quinn Slobodian
Think about the world. You might be picturing a globe in a classroom, with its patchwork of multi-colored nations. But what if that’s only part of the story? -
Chatter: ‘Special Military Operations’ Against the Russians with Benjamin Wittes
-
Chatter: ‘Special Military Operations’ Against the Russians with Benjamin Wittes
-
Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Twitter in Taamneh, Remands Gonzalez
The companion cases mark a major decision in platform liability for terrorist material hosted on their services. -
Why the Manhattan DA Trump Case Cannot Be Removed To Federal Court
Fortunately for Bragg, there are good reasons to conclude that the elected president was not an “officer of the United States.”
More Articles
-
The Situation: Where’s the Lie?
The government’s response to James Comey’s vindictive prosecution raises one very big and important question. -
U.S. Military Detention and Transfer in Its Fight Against Cartels
The recent detention and repatriation of two survivors of a U.S. military strike marks another legal evolution in the Trump administration’s claimed armed conflict with drug cartels. -
Lawfare Live, The Now: Tariff Oral Argument at the Supreme Court
On Nov. 5 at 3:30 pm ET join Scott R. Anderson, Peter Harrell, and Kathleen Claussen for a live discussion.
