-
Tighter U.S. export controls do not weaken China’s AI incentive system. They strengthen it, by deepening the dependence that drives it.
-
Nicholas Enrich discusses his experience within USAID as DOGE dismantled it from the inside.
-
When do strikes on dual-use urban infrastructure comply with the law of armed conflict—and when do they become indiscriminate attacks?
-
Drones threaten U.S. bases, but recent amendments to Section 130i force deletion of the data needed to identify patterns and adapt.
-
Patrick Radden Keefe discusses his investigation of a London teenager’s fatal plunge into the Thames.
-
The administration lacks authority to mandate frontier model vetting—but existing CAISI and CISA tools enable a voluntary alternative.
-
Despite the spin, these consent decrees are negotiated settlements—not court verdicts. They contain no judicial finding or admission that a Biden-era “censorship regime” existed.
-
A panel of experts break down Supreme Court oral argument in Chatrie v. United States.
-
A farewell tribute to a longtime member of the Lawfare community
-
A complaint filed with the UN alleges that the Trump administration’s immigration law practices violate international human rights obligations.
-
From preemption to “managed federalism” and the reallocation of legislative authority
-
Listen to the May 1 podcast as a livestream.
.jpeg?sfvrsn=ecb5f958_3)
