AI labs already write constitutions for their models. What they lack is a court to interpret them.

A Review of Eyck Freymann’s “Defending Taiwan: A Strategy to Prevent War With China” (Oxford University Press, 2026)

The latest edition of the Seriously Risky Business cybersecurity newsletter, now on Lawfare.

Participation in the promotion of land sales in the occupied Palestinian territories violates the Geneva Conventions and may be a war crime.

AI constitutionalism is too important to leave to the labs. Here are the questions scholars should take up.

DHS deploys AI in immigration enforcement largely untested, undisclosed, and unreviewed, a preview of how AI could reshape executive power. 

A halt in Grokipedia’s edit pipeline offers a case study in how an AI-generated reference system governs its own content.

Without legislation, the geofence warrant ruling risks becoming a high-water mark rather than a floor for digital privacy.

A proposed Taiwanese law would draw lawmakers beyond their representative role and into direct involvement in private investment decisions.

The first public hearing of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court had its stumbles.

Denying First Amendment protection to AI outputs sounds like a rule about machines. In practice it could burden human speech online.

Your weekly summary of everything on the site.