A partisan divide remains—in contrast with Democrats and independents, more Republicans see antisemitic attitudes behind the protests than anger with Israeli actions.

While § 12406 guarantees some role for the state, it is likely far more minimal than what California asserts.

The bomber adhered to fringe anti-life philosophies—joining a troubling trend of attacks inspired by nihilistic ideologies.

Can protesters show more discipline than the president in a dangerous situation?

The nexus between terrorism and migration is more complex than often portrayed in public discourse.

Undisciplined invocations of treason undermine the crime’s true meaning and endanger meaningful political discourse.

The president hasn’t invoked the Insurrection Act. He’s instead relying on a theory of inherent constitutional power that is far more limited.

The Indian government’s commitment to divisive narratives is preventing progress in Kashmir and complicating its foreign policy.

Can the courts even review the Trump administration’s suspension of entry of Harvard students?

Your weekly summary of everything on the site. 

Beyond mere military damage, the drone attack will usher in a new era of paranoia and disrupt Russia’s internal economy.

Recent statements show how the court will review the Trump administration’s actions—at least until the Supreme Court says otherwise.

There are few remaining obstacles to the U.S. military using offensive cyber operations at home against the president’s domestic “enemies.”

The latest edition of the Seriously Risky Business cybersecurity newsletter, now on Lawfare.