-
Any attempt to authorize domestic military deployments by designating fentanyl a weapon of mass destruction rests on absurd legal theories.
-
Scott Anderson sat down with Benjamin Wittes, Natalie Orpett, and Molly Roberts for a special deep-dive into the intervention in Venezuela.
-
Without clear definitions, commanders risk issuing unlawful orders, and troops risk obeying them.
-
The court’s ruling about who can oversee an obstruction of justice investigation into military officials has broad rule-of-law implications.
-
China’s military possesses some dangerous weapons, but its ability to outfight the U.S. military is seriously overstated.
-
Listen to the Jan. 4 livestream as a podcast.
-
Lawfare contributors answer listener submitted questions.
-
Scott Anderson sat down with Benjamin Wittes, Anna Bower, and Tyler McBrien to talk over listener-submitted topics and object lessons for the annual end-of-year episode.
-
Fidelity to the Constitution requires officers to protect, not supplant, constitutional institutions.
-
Lawfare contributors reflect on 2025.
-
President Trump’s WMD designation could have major implications for civil-military relations and asset forfeiture, if courts agree.
-
Assessing the current state of civil-military affairs.
.jpeg?sfvrsn=e13b9854_7)
.jpg?sfvrsn=cbb26fe8_11)
.jpg?sfvrsn=cb803a66_6)
